I wouldn’t be getting into teaching if I didn’t highly value caring for others as an aspect of the work I do. I like the ethical guidance that says that our task is basically to heal the world, and I see that assignment primarily as involving helping those around you to flourish (having first taken care of yourself). I got tired of work that has me almost exclusively in front of a computer. I wanted a new career working more with people, and I’m very motivated by imparting knowledge/insight/meaning. And I also wanted some kind of caring role involved. Teaching fits these parts together.
The goal is to create a positive classroom climate. Now comes the interesting part. Me with a class of 20 kids, some of them challenging my control, others beating each other up emotionally just outside of my view. And suppose many of them are not from my cultural background, which is predominantly white and rural, with quite a lot of exposure to privilege. I have to admit, imposing authority hasn’t been my modus operandi in life. But I understand that it’s the necessary other half of the coin for guiding with empathy to be effective. To be trusted to resolve interpersonal problems fairly, to take care of a student in need, the students’ experience needs to be contained within a boundary of active control.
The caring and concern needs to be distributed so that each student feels that he/she is an equal recipient of it.
Rules can be bent, in a sense. That is, before imposing a disciplinary rule, the teacher can pull the student aside to a one-to-one chat about what’s going on with that student. Almost certainly, if the teacher is not an out-of-touch authoritarian to begin with, the acting out is going to be more about the student’s situation than about the teacher or the class. The teacher’s task is to get some clue from the student “what’s going on.” Best to get it from the student him/herself. Then a meaningful resolution can be built around that understanding.
I was thinking of the horrible video that emerged this week of the white school cop throwing the black girl out of her seat. There’s a lot that can and should be said about that, and I’m not intending to blame the teacher, but with this topic on my mind, I’ve asked myself, what might lead up to such a situation? Ideally, the teacher would not have had to ask the cop into the classroom to intervene, right? But there’s this disruptive student, not relinquishing the cellphone in class. The things one would hope the teacher would have implemented before things got to this point include: having an agreement that the students have bought into, about no phones in class; making an effort to get to know something about each student; watching out for students who are inclined to be disruptive and focusing extra attention on them to better understand what’s triggering them; and finding a strategy to overcome their resistances.
The main idea is to show the students that they are part of creating the positive climate. It can mean involving them in defining class rules or agreements. Then, when students break these rules, they all have more of a stake in where the situation leads. And this allows the teacher’s response, if it’s more compassionate than literalistic, to be seen as restorative and intentional, rather than as reneging on applying the rules.
With respect to bullying, I like the idea of “zero indifference” – never letting disrespectful conduct go unaddressed; always naming and respond to behaviors. It’s not about punishment. It’s about making every incident of the conduct consequential, modeling concern.
Concerning bias and respecting different cultural backgrounds, the recommendations are to provide safe spaces where students are seen, valued, cared for and respected. If you show you value students’ lives and identities, and commit to avoiding and challenging stereotypes, you are creating conditions in which misunderstandings have less chance of arising or sticking.
Nate Binzen's blog spells out the latest.
terreplein (ter' pla-n) n. [Fr. < It. terrepieno < terrapienare, to fill with earth, terrace < terra (see TERRACE) + pienare, to fill < L. plenus, full: see PLENTY] a level platform behind a parapet, rampart, etc., where guns are mounted
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Our digital profiles and the lifelong task of curating them
In this education future-cast I look at how a new lifelong task of curating our digital profiles, along with increasingly sophisticated employment testing, relate to identity formation and the mission of educators. It calls for authentic self-discovery of an individual’s gifts and temperament.There is a risk of cautious conformism. What if someone’s best potential is somehow related to a way of not ‘fitting in’? How can teachers help guide young people into this new world?
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Students’ Use of Mobile Devices for Learning
Mobile devices (smartphones, tablets, smartwatches) might not have been around when you grew up, but they are going to be on the educational scene from now until… forever. And on balance, this is going to be a good thing.
I say that even though I’m quite cautious and skeptical
about the digital world children enter into nowadays. I am dismayed when I see
a five-year-old plunked down with an iPad, playing games for hours on end. As
far as I’m concerned, that kid’s mind is far better served by being engaged in the
world around him/herself, especially plain old leaves, dirt, sticks, grass. If
that’s not available, a book to look at, an art project, building blocks. I don’t
believe parents genuinely hand their kids these electronic devices to make them
smarter – what they’re doing is buying some time off from minding the kid. And
that’s totally understandable and okay!
Yet… I’ve come to think that a period of ‘mindlessly’
watching TV – my own parents’ answer to the kid time-drain – is in some ways
better than a tablet, especially when good videos are selected by the parents.
Sure, kids’ TV is passive, and often not very enlightening. But my concern with
tablets and the like is that these devices are so immersive that they are certainly shaping the brain of their
young users, in ways we don’t even understand. Later on, we’ll see that the
time they spend checked out of the real world and into the virtual shaped their
character – in ways we don’t yet know. It’s an experiment. Young minds are malleable,
and there are many ways our modern world drives a kind of distance between us as we grow up that
would be alien to earlier generations.
Okay, that’s my skepticism, and it is mostly concerned with
the exposure of the youngest ages, say up until 8. But let’s consider the world of the 7th
grade teacher. Pretty certain, every kid in his/her class will have put in substantial
time on an interactive device – a game console, a computer, a phone, a tablet.
They’re natives. It’s no good denying it; now the question becomes, how do we
channel the time they’re going to spend online anyway into activities that are
most beneficial, most educational for them? There are a couple of tricky parts
to this: How to slip that objective in
there without making it boring and easily rejected in favor of a favorite game?
And how to know that the activity is
beneficial?
For the teacher, these are such crucial questions, because as
soon as the kids are out of the classroom, these digital diversions immediately become their go-to activities. What we want is market share in their head space
(permit me some jargon; it’s actually serious, because that’s what all the
advertisers in the world are grappling for, 24/7). Building some of this
digital/mobile activity into homework and classroom activity is the way to take
some of that territory.
Conversely, because of their already-blossoming “addiction”
to these devices, allowing the students to engage in absorbing problem-solving
and learning activities on them is a surefire way to increase the students' interest
in and commitment to the business the class is conducting. Don’t you suppose
they’d rather work on that iPad assignment than the one that requires them to crack open
a book or put pen to paper?
We should also bear in mind that the fields of authentically
researched and validated project-based learning and educational gaming are coming
into full renaissance now. Increasingly, researchers and developers are producing
online activities that are substantially
outperforming traditional means for teaching certain subjects, as measured
by resulting test scores. For learning certain things, the digital game medium is just better
than a great teacher in the same room.
And there’s efficiency: as a teacher trainee, I’ve been
assigned a lot of online reading, videos, and such. When I’m commuting or
standing in a line, I can just pull out my phone, access my next reading
assignment, and get right to it. That convenience makes me want to do it right
now, because I know I’ll have to take care of it at some point, and right here and now I have
some time to burn. Later, it’ll surely get in the way of whatever else I’d rather
be doing.
So, teacher, how best to seize this opportunity?
- Only do what is reasonably accessible to all your students. The activity must reduce the “digital divide” (by which less privileged kids get less access), not increase it. If it fails this test, don’t do it.
- Make it project-based. Learning through projects that require problem-solving sticks far better than rote learning, and digital media can excel at this.
- Make it game-based. A good game requires experimentation, and delivers stages of advancement and reward that propel the learner forward.
- Test it out. You need to avoid technical hindrances that could derail an otherwise great project.
- Go with what’s proven, and with what works for you. Rely on what’s been tried and well-reviewed; and if you have a different reaction, move on to something else.
- Make the kids figure it out. They are your best resource for finding ways to keep the project moving forward – they are natives, after all; they enjoy the challenge; and they learn from it.
- Go with easy. If something isn’t working, reach for the alternative. Better yet, rely on your kids to do that.
- Make the kids help each other. Collaboration should be built into the assignment. And more advanced students should get credit for helping others who need guidance.
- Make it measurable. There should be good ways to assess what’s been learned.
I recently led students in a “functional geography” activity,
in which they used tablets to capture photos and audio narrations to describe
particular locations and the purposes for which they’re used. Then they sent
this field material in, and edited it together in a voicethread. This was a
project that involved creativity, collaboration, and quite a lot of
problem-solving as they worked out how to get the material onto one device,
then send it to another. They learned to act fast, to find work-arounds when
they hit a roadblock, to perform, and to use their devices in productive ways
they’ve never encountered before.
A friend of mine has his students create a podcast about
some aspect of their family history. While much of the editing might happen on
a laptop, the capturing of this material is most easily done with any mobile
digital device that can capture sound and send it elsewhere. And when the
student needs to transcribe the interview, s/he can easily do it at home using
this device, not having to wait for one of the two computers in the classroom
to become available. The efficiencies these devices enable make the project
more practical to achieve in a reasonable amount of time, without getting
tangled up in technicalities.
This stuff isn’t the future; it’s the present. And with a
bit of inventiveness, combined with a thoughtful consideration of educational objectives,
it’s going to make for better schooling.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)